Monthly Archives: February 2010

Want to save $243?

A new study talks about the impact of crappy customer service.  Unlike any of the rants on that topic in this space, it quantifies the effect based on research.  Not that I have to worry about letting facts get in the way of my story, but I thought I’d share it with you.

Here are the headlines:

Consumers feel the most significant root causes of poor service are:

  • Repeating themselves
  • Being trapped in automated self-service
  • Forced to wait too long for service
  • Representatives don’t know my history and value
  • Cannot switch between communication channels easily

33% cite voice self-service  as the most challenging channel compared to only 1% who find it most satisfying. And 38% of consumers said it is critical to improve voice self-service to make it more intelligently integrated with human assisted service. Where they were trapped in an automated system, consumers spent, on average, more than 9.5 minutes trying to reach a human.

It goes on to say that the average value (in one year) of each customer relationship lost to a competitor or abandoned is $243.

You can read the summary here but you already knew all this since you’re a loyal reader.  Right?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Leave a comment

Filed under Helpful Hints

The Other Guy

Monitoring and Control project activities

Amazing things happen as deadlines approach.  Generally competent people begin to panic and that panic clouds their judgment, their communications skills and their ability to function.  Way back in psych class, we learned about how individuals are hyper vigilant to danger cues, remember those cues related to their fears, and will assign threatening interpretations to ambiguous cues.  In English, that means that everything bothers them and they stop functioning.  What they do a lot of is pointing fingers. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Helpful Hints, Thinking Aloud

Tic Tac Toe

A strange but valid position in a Tic-Tac-Toe ...

The media business is, in part, founded on the medium’s ability to deliver eyeballs to advertisers. Obviously the ability of any one medium (and I mean, for example, a TV channel, not all of TV) to do that on a large-scale has been diminished over the years. However, there is an expectation, in my opinion, on the part of advertisers that somewhere at the end of the media equation is a sale.

Part of what we used to sell in TV was the fact that there is only one ad on the screen at a time and your product is front and center. And while that’s still true, a few other things have changed which show how dumb we TV folks have become in many ways. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Reality checks, Thinking Aloud