Yet another piece of research that caused an eyebrow to rise up bubbled up in my news stream yesterday. This one is from the Ascend2 folks via MarketingProfs and concerns strategy in digital marketing. Two thirds of the marketers survey think they’re doing an OK job with another quarter believing they are doing a great job. It’s what they identified as challenges that piqued my interest and which is our topic today:
Marketers say a lack of effective strategies is the biggest obstacle to success in digital marketing… More than half of marketers surveyed (51%) cited strategy issues when asked to list the major factors preventing them from fully achieving their digital marketing goals. Budget constraints were the second most cited obstacle (picked by 38% of respondents); lack of training/experience was next (32%), followed by inability to prove ROI (30%), and useless metrics/analytics (25%).
Budget is an issue for everyone it seems no matter what your company or role. Given the constantly changing set of tools, I can understand the lack of training. The other items on the list are more concerning. First and of greatest concern is that over half feel they lack a strategy that works and yet they seem to be executing anyway. That’s firing without aiming. This finding doesn’t really shock me given experiences I have had with clients. There is an appetite to jump into new spaces without giving much thought as to why or how. What’s of interest as well is what happens when marketers are asked about what does seem to be effective:
Some 54% of respondents rate email as one of their most successful digital marketing tactics; 48% rate websites as a top tactic; 47% search engine optimization; 43% social media. Email is also seen as a relatively easy digital marketing tactic to execute, with only 11% of respondents rating it as one of the most difficult channels.
No surprise – email is well understood by most companies since it’s been around for a long time. It’s also in wide enough use that one can benchmark and learn from the mistakes of others. Much easier to aim before firing, right?
“Why” needs to come before “how”. Aiming needs to come before firing. After all, no brand has that many chances with consumers and if you can’t hit the mark the first time there might not be a second. You agree?
The folks at Eater provide our food for thought on this Foodie Friday. They ran an interesting piece on 72 ways food can change the world. It’s a collection of brief articles from chefs, farmers, scientists, and others. It’s worth your time.
One piece that got me thinking was an interview with a food scientist from Washington State University. This quote, in particular about working outside of the mainstream commodity system, resonated:
If you had a big truck with twenty tons of wheat and went to the grain elevator they would look at the stuff we work with and say, “That’s purple, that’s a different shape, and that doesn’t work for the commodity systems,” which are built on the notion of a huge amount of virtually identical, interchangeable product. By focusing on non-commodity varieties, we can pay attention to things like nutritional value and flavor—things that that big commodity farmers and programs tend to not care about. For them all that matters is yield.
There’s a great business point in there for all of us. The farmers with whom the professor works think about the game differently. Rather than allowing the vagaries of the market to dictate their product they bypass the large, proven markets and focus on aggregating niche markets. They control their product and find buyers as opposed to bowing down before the commodity system. This gives them the freedom to improve the product – grain in this case – since they are not growing to product specifications imposed on them.
Over time, one or more of those niche markets may, in fact, become mainstream. In other markets we might call them “early adopters.” It’s not hard to remember when a high-definition television, a tablet computer, or a hybrid car were niches. The “farmers” behind them didn’t try to make a mass-market product out of the gate. They made something better knowing that if it was good enough the market would come to them.
Food for thought!
Filed under Consulting, food
A shofar made from a ram’s horn is traditionally blown in observance of Rosh Hashanah, the beginning of the Jewish civic year. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Happy New Year! When I posted this last year for the second time I said I was thinking about making this post an annual thing. I guess it now officially is. As Jews around the world celebrate Rosh Hashanah, I thought I’d try to put what the holiday means into a business context.
Last night marked the start of the Jewish New Year. I didn’t go down to Times Square to see if they were dropping a giant knish at the stroke of sundown – probably not. L’Shana Tova – a happy and healthy New Year to all of you.
One of the things Jews do over the next 10 days (or at least are supposed to do) is to reflect on the year gone by and think about where it took you on life’s journey. It’s not really as much about looking back in my mind as it is about looking forward. Oh sure, one is supposed to think about where one strayed from life’s path in terms of dealing with other humans and human codes of conduct. We get a day of fasting next week to get that sorted out. But it’s also a time to think about a fresh start. Which, of course, promoted a business thought.
When do businesses stop and enter a period of reflection? It’s obvious when they’re changing – witness Facebook last week – but I, for one, certainly wonder sometimes if those changes happen due to the momentum of previous (maybe not so good) decisions or if they’re the result of a pause, some reflection, and a willful thought by the entire organization as to the direction. Often, I fear, it’s the former.
Jews are to use the next ten days for reflection and repentance. I like to think of them as ten days of self-improvement. I’d also suggest that it would do many businesses a lot of good to build the same sort of period into their corporate calendars. Some do – they call it the budget process – but I think that’s too selective in terms of participants and goals to do much good. Some smart CEO needs to declare it New Year’s Day for the company once a year and get everyone to do the same sort of professional reflection that many of us do on the personal side. Identify your sins (figuratively speaking) and atone. Faulty customer service, weak brand identity, bad employee relations, products that aren’t optimal, fostering an atmosphere of fear – these are all good places to start.
Tonight marks the start of the new year in the Jewish calendar. I thought, given the occasion, that some of you might have resolutions on your mind so here is a thought and maybe something we can all resolve to do a bit better.
While our world has never been more connected I can’t recall a time when it seems as if people who work together seem very disconnected. What I mean is that people come in to the office and log on to their computers, put in their earphones, and do their things. When they need to interact with someone else on their team or elsewhere in the company they send email or instant message. That often applies even when the person to whom they are “speaking” is on the other side of an office wall or in the next cube. As a manager, this drove me crazy.
Maybe I’m very old school. I learned the interpersonal parts of business long before there was IM, email, or even computers on every desk. The nature of interpersonal communication these days, particularly among younger people is quite different. I appreciate that having unlimited texting trumps unlimited voice. However, when you think about it the one skill that many younger workers lack is the ability to read people. Email and IM are faceless and can’t communicate nuance. You can’t be sure you’re hearing tone accurately.
That was why I used to tell the folks with whom I worked that my expectation of them was that when they had need to communicate with a co-worker that they would get up and walk to the next cube. I thought it was important especially if that cube was located on another floor. Your presence means you are giving the matter a lot of attention and they should too. If they can’t go in person (it’s not easy to walk to the cube in another building or city), then call. Hear their voice. Gauge their tone. Learn to listen. If those things fail, then email.
That’s the thing I’m suggesting we resolve to do. Be more human as the world gets less so. Walk to the next cube instead of writing yet another email. I’m going to try. Will you?
If you’ve spent more than a few minutes here on the screed you’re aware of my unbridled passion for golf. As any golfer will tell you, when all else fails and your game hits rock bottom, it’s time for new equipment. As sure as the sun will rise it’s always the tool and not the carpenter. From where does one buy that new driver that is going to solve all of one’s issues? The answer to that is actually instructive for most businesses.
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
In general, one either goes to the pro shop at your local club or to a golf store. Of late most of those golf stores are located in cyberspace. This has hurt the big brick and mortar golf chains badly. In fact, not long ago Dick’s laid off 500 PGA Pros and is scaling back its golf business. After all, the irons are the same not matter if you’re buying them from the manufacturer (who will sell direct), a big box retailer, the golf store, eBay, or your pro shop. Suddenly, while every brand of club is different, once you’ve decided on the make and model the club itself is the same no matter which source you choose. This has placed pressure on margins. In this case, as is the case in many other businesses, the internet wins every time.
The real question is why should a consumer bother going to the golf store? In the case of Dick’s, they did exactly the wrong thing. eBay can’t do proper club fittings – making sure the length, lie, and swing weight are right for you. Sure, you can get golf lessons from YouTube but that’s not nearly as good as having one on one instruction. The shop at my club will put new grips on my existing clubs, extending their life. I’m certainly not going to mail them someplace to have that done.
In other words, every business needs to figure out why consumers should care about them – why they should bother. Price works for businesses without a human touch. In fact, the move toward more personalization for web-based businesses points directly to the advantage any real-world business will have: the human touch. We’d rather speak with humans. Don’t automated customer service lines frustrate you? I don’t want to press 3 if my issue involves an odor of gas – I want to talk to a person NOW!
We need to think about how our brands and businesses can get consumers to care. Otherwise we’re completely vulnerable to someone who will do what we do and sell what we do for a dollar less – free shipping included.
I am meeting a former client for lunch today. As is the case so often, he suggested a local burger place to meet and I went to their website to check out the menu. It was a very pretty site – high quality photos, nicely written copy. Oh sure I have a few quibbles with it – why do I have to follow you on Twitter to see the specials? – but it’s a perfect example of what a site should have been about 10 years ago. Now? Not so much.
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)
What’s my beef with the burger joint (I crack myself up!) site? It’s written in Flash. Why is this an issue? As you probably know, the number of smartphone users now rivals desktop. Most of the site I work with see a large and growing amount of traffic from mobile devices. A recent study about this stated that “Mobile is often the only tool used to make a purchase decision—this is especially true for restaurants and entertainment purchases.”
Sounds like good news unless your site is written in Flash. You see, no Apple device – iPhone or iPad – shows anything written in Flash. Many Android devices won’t either unless Flash is loaded onto the phone. In this case I tried to access the site via my phone’s browser and was prompted to load Flash. No separate mobile site written in a programming language understood by all phones.
By leaving development – even state of the art development – as it was in 2004 before the massive growth of traffic from mobile, this place is hurting its business. As the study found:
One data point is especially favorable for restaurants. Of the industries analyzed for this study, restaurants have the highest conversion rate from looker to buyer—80 percent. The factors that drive smartphone users to make a purchase at a restaurant after seeking information about it are:
• Right price: 15 percent
• Right brand: 18 percent
• Had a location in mind: 19 percent
• Reviews were good: 12 percent
• Close to my location: 20 percent
How is the potential customer to weigh those factors when they can’t see the site? When mobile is 51% of your potential traffic, isn’t it worth at last SOME investment?
Have you gone to your site on a mobile device? How did that work for you? 2014 or 2004?