Tag Archives: Recruitment

Skills

Something a little different here on Foodie Friday.

Film poster for Napoleon Dynamite - Copyright ...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

We’re going to start with a movie which leads us to food which of course leads us to business. Kind of a prix fixe, three-course menu!  The movie even has the name of a pastry in its title: Napoleon Dynamite. I love this film, and in particular I love the sequence in which Napoleon is bemoaning his lack of talent:

Napoleon Dynamite: I don’t even have any good skills.
Pedro: What do you mean?
Napoleon Dynamite: You know, like nunchuku skills, bow hunting skills, computer hacking skills… Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills.

Funny thing is, kitchens only want them as well, Napoleon, and it’s becoming rarer for those skills to make appearances as the nature of our food chain changes.  Outside of the top restaurants in any given city (and maybe not even there), many basic kitchen skills have…well…disappeared.  No, I’m not talking about the ability to chiffonade or brunoise with eye-blinding speed.  Those skills won’t ever be lost.  It’s more the ability to do things such as recognizing various species of fish, knowing how to tell they are fresh, knowing how to skin and fillet them.  Today, cooks order what they want from suppliers and they often come broken down and portioned.

The same can be said about meat.  Cooks know cryovac, not  the different cuts of meat, much less how they are butchered and how they need to be cooked.  Even home cooks can get any ingredient and there are no “seasons” per se, but professionals should understand native ingredients, their seasons and  how they are grown.  All of the above are skills – basic skills in my book – if you want to run a professional kitchen.  Dealing with fresh, unprocessed ingredients recognizing quality, understanding what works with respect to taste and flavor are the underpinnings of the kitchen. Dealing fairly and responsibly with suppliers and  running a business are the underpinning of the enterprise.

It’s not much different in the broader business world.  Any manager will tell you that recruitment and retention of skilled staff is a major challenge. The pressure to retain promising people sometimes means that they’re being promoted too quickly, which means they don’t have the experience to deal with certain critical situations.  Younger staff learn to rely on spell checks and miss contextual spelling errors.  They don’t learn the differences between online writing and formal business writing.  They have difficulty listening in a world that encourages selfies.

Skills will never go out of style, even in a world where the ingredients come pre-portioned.  Those who succeed will be the ones that know how to break down a primal cut – learning grammar and speaking skills in the office sense.  That’s my take.  Yours?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under food, Thinking Aloud

Coach Knight

We’re down to The Final Four (Go Blue!) and so what better place than the Golf Channel to have a chat with a great college coach?  That’s exactly what aired last evening as part of Feherty, one of my not so guilty pleasures.  David Feherty interviewed Bob Knight, best known as the coach of Indiana University.   He’s the sort of coach that many people love to hate – they respect his accomplishments but can’t understand the screaming, chair-throwing, and general misbehaving that he did.  The interview helped me to understand it – and him – a lot better.

Bobby Knight (en), coach of the Texas Tech Red...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Early on in the show, Coach Knight said something that really resonated with me as a businessperson and it’s our topic today.  It seems kind of simple but it often gets lost:

The role of a coach or the role of a teacher is to get the player or student to be the best that they can be.

Exactly.  Not “to get them to achieve some impossibly high standard that even professional athletes can’t reach.”  Not “to win a championship at all costs.”  It’s centered around understanding each kid and the potential for greatness that’s in each of them to whatever degree it exists.  Even if the kid doesn’t get it.  Then the challenge is to fulfill that potential.

Think about it in a business context.  How many managers are focused on “winning the championship” and not on getting each employee to be the best that they can be?   Instead of using the initial interview process to determine what that potential might be, many managers think about it as filing a box on the org chart.  They don’t think about complimentary skill sets, the potential to advance, or how well the candidate will fit into the group.  Instead, they assume the people are fungible.  Big mistake.

If we take the time to think carefully about Coach Knight’s standard, it becomes obvious that the key to success lies in looking hard for potential, especially if that potential is untapped to a great degree.  After all, if we’re focused on getting people to be the best that they can be, we want that bar set pretty high so the organization as a whole is elevated.

What do you think?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Helpful Hints, Thinking Aloud

Why You Can’t Find A Great Person To Hire

One of my favorite Shakespeare quotes is from Julius Caesar and is spoken by Cassius. He’s trying to get Brutus to stop Caesar and reminds him that “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings”. In other words, we control our own destinies, not fate.

 

Employment Exhibition

(Photo credit: Modern_Language_Center)

 

I thought of that this morning as I saw some research on recruiting from the folks at Bullhorn. It’s an annual survey of recruiting professionals and in it they asked about what those folks perceived to be the biggest challenge they would face this year.  As MediaPost reported:

 

Recruiting professionals listed their biggest challenge for 2013 as a lack of skilled candidates (33%). Additionally, in a separate question, 76.1% of respondents claimed to have a shortage of skilled candidates in their respective recruiting sectors.

 

What does this have to do with the Shakespeare quote?  We’re in the midst of a nasty employment cycle.  You’ll notice I said “employment” cycle, not economic.  The stock market is back to where it was in 2000 and  corporate earnings have doubled since then.  Even so, employment is soft.  Part of that has to do with how technology has made many processes way more efficient.  I think it’s had another effect which has to do with why qualified job candidates are so hard to find.

 

Many managers have come to think of employees as disposable.  They’re lucky to have jobs and if they’re not happy there are lots of people available.   Due to this, there’s less of an emphasis on training and development   The tech factor is at work here as well – think about how many people can’t write properly because the machine checks spelling and grammar (but not meaning or homophones or homonyms).   We don’t train so people are less skilled.  Because they’re less skilled, the recruiters have a small pool from which to draw.  The fault, dear hiring employer, is in ourselves.  You agree?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Helpful Hints, Reality checks