Monthly Archives: March 2013

Tips

The end of a snowy, wet week here in the Northeastern US and it makes me glad we can have a little Foodie Friday Fun.  We usually go out to eat on Friday nights and as we did so last week I got to thinking about how servers get paid.  That, in turn, lead to a broader thought about restaurants in general and how their business has changed with the growth of social.  Let me explain.

Servers work primarily for tips.  There’s usually some sort of minimum wage paid but their livelihood depends on the instant feedback a tip provides.  Bad service can mean a couple of hours working for not much money.  Doing a great job can mean extra cash.  Oh sure – in some places  tips are pooled and a good server gets shafted while the lazy ones and the owner take an equal share.  For the most part, however, how much you earn is tied to how well you do your job.  As an aside, that’s why I rarely leave a bad tip – unless there was no service or it was an absolute disaster the server did some work for me and they should be paid.

It’s an interesting dynamic.  The server can be perfectly competent but if the kitchen is badly run the service seems to be a mess as well.  The difference is the cooks are all on salary in most places while the servers can suffer the consequences.  Where the overall operation feels the pain is in the magnifying effect of social media.  A bad experience used to be a secret.  Today they’re aggregated, searched, and considered as people make their dining decisions.  It can kill a business or it can help everyone involved to do very well.  Why do I bring this up?

We should all operate as if we’re servers.  While for some of us compensation can be tied directly to how well or poorly we do our jobs, for most people in corporate life we make what we make – compensation is something we negotiate when we’re hired even if some of it might be tied to a bonus or to stock holdings.  We don’t go home most days with a paycheck that mirrors how well we performed.  Too bad – it might force a lot of people to consider the performance more often.

What would you earn if everyone with whom you came in contact had the option to tip you for the job you did?  What kind of tips would you give out to those with whom you’ve chosen to do business?   Something I’m thinking about as the week comes to an end.  You?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Reality checks, Thinking Aloud

Why You Can’t Find A Great Person To Hire

One of my favorite Shakespeare quotes is from Julius Caesar and is spoken by Cassius. He’s trying to get Brutus to stop Caesar and reminds him that “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves, that we are underlings”. In other words, we control our own destinies, not fate.

 

Employment Exhibition

(Photo credit: Modern_Language_Center)

 

I thought of that this morning as I saw some research on recruiting from the folks at Bullhorn. It’s an annual survey of recruiting professionals and in it they asked about what those folks perceived to be the biggest challenge they would face this year.  As MediaPost reported:

 

Recruiting professionals listed their biggest challenge for 2013 as a lack of skilled candidates (33%). Additionally, in a separate question, 76.1% of respondents claimed to have a shortage of skilled candidates in their respective recruiting sectors.

 

What does this have to do with the Shakespeare quote?  We’re in the midst of a nasty employment cycle.  You’ll notice I said “employment” cycle, not economic.  The stock market is back to where it was in 2000 and  corporate earnings have doubled since then.  Even so, employment is soft.  Part of that has to do with how technology has made many processes way more efficient.  I think it’s had another effect which has to do with why qualified job candidates are so hard to find.

 

Many managers have come to think of employees as disposable.  They’re lucky to have jobs and if they’re not happy there are lots of people available.   Due to this, there’s less of an emphasis on training and development   The tech factor is at work here as well – think about how many people can’t write properly because the machine checks spelling and grammar (but not meaning or homophones or homonyms).   We don’t train so people are less skilled.  Because they’re less skilled, the recruiters have a small pool from which to draw.  The fault, dear hiring employer, is in ourselves.  You agree?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Helpful Hints, Reality checks