Category Archives: Reality checks

The Boss And Your Consumers Are Thinking Alike

Part of what my clients pay me to do is to make connections.  Sometimes that’s in the literal sense – an introduction.  Most of the time it’s in the sense of making connections among seemingly random things – putting pieces together to form a coherent picture.  This morning, I’m getting ready to go see another Bruce Springsteen show – anything worth doing is worth overdoing, right? – and I came upon two pieces that seemed to fit together so I wanted to share them with you.

Bruce Springsteen (with Max Weinberg in backgr...

Bruce Springsteen in concert (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The first is an excellent article from The Nation about Bruce’s political voice – where it came from, how it’s grown, and what it’s saying now.  The second is a piece of research about socially conscious consumers.  Now as you know, we don’t do politics here so there is an important business point both pieces make and that’s what I want to share today.

The Nation piece says the following:

Springsteen began to ask questions of himself about what really determined the contours of the lives of the working-class characters whose tribune he had become. “A lot of the core of our songs is the American idea: What is it? What does it mean?

Speaking to reporters in Paris on the occasion of (Wrecking Ball’s) release, he made the album’s inspiration—and intention—explicit. “The genesis of the record was after 2008,” he told a group of reporters there earlier this year, “when we had the huge financial crisis in the States, and there was really no accountability for years and years. People lost their homes, and I had friends who were losing their homes, and nobody went to jail. Nobody was responsible. People lost enormous amounts of their net worth. Previous to Occupy Wall Street, there was no pushback: there was no movement, there was no voice that was saying just how outrageous—that a basic theft had occurred that struck at the heart of what the entire American idea was about. It was a complete disregard of history, of context, of community; it was all about ‘what can I get today.’ It was just an enormous fault line that cracked the American system wide open.”

In other words, Bruce has done what most great artists do:  reflects his times in a timeless way.  We could digress here and look to the Occupy movement, the current presidential campaign, etc. but you figured that out already.  As it turns out, many forward-thinking companies have as well.  The second article is about a Nielsen study about how companies and consumers are becoming much more socially conscious:

The survey confirmed that the majority of consumers express a general preference for companies making a positive difference in the world. 66% of consumers around the world say they prefer to buy products and services from companies that have implemented programs to give back to society. That preference extends to other matters as well. They prefer to work for or invest in these companies. A smaller share, but still nearly half, say they are willing to pay extra for products and services from these socially conscious companies.

So today’s point is this:  while doing well by doing good isn’t a mandate, consumers are paying attention, and if your business isn’t, you might be falling behind.  To paraphrase Dylan, the times are a-changin’ yet again.  I’ve pointed out before that marketing today isn’t about you but about us – your consumers and our connections to your business.  That outward focus needs to mirror the concerns and solve the problems of your customers, who clearly are more socially conscious than they’ve been.

Those are how these pieces connect in my mind – how about in yours?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Helpful Hints, Reality checks, Uncategorized

Strange Brew

“Strange brew, killin’ what’s inside of you”.  That’s the refrain of Cream’s 1967 song and our Foodie Friday theme today.  I got to thinking about this as the “pink slime” debate raged.  For anyone uninitiated, that’s a food additive that meat processors use and many of us unwittingly consume.  Suffice it to say it’s gross.  There was an article in the Wall Street Journal about it last week.  That piece got picked up in a post by Media Post about the controversy.  Not the best of things to read around meal time.  I don’t care to have ammonia in my food.  In fact, I definitely don’t want anything in my food that I would not be expecting and if there is something unusual in there it needs to be identified so I can make a decision about how brave I’m feeling.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA - JANUARY 31:  Fresh ground ...

(Image credit: Getty Images via @daylife)

Every so often I think it’s good to remind ourselves that these types of products don’t make themselves and that food isn’t the only business that produces products that aren’t fully transparent with respect to how they operate.  Tracking pixels anyone?  As marketers, there’s really no upside in being nefarious.  In a connected world, we end up getting caught more often than not.  As people from Nixon to Clinton can tell you, the cover-up is way worse than the crime.

Let’s think about this from MSNBC.com:

Food adulteration is more than just your neighborhood fish counter selling you farm-raised salmon and telling you it’s line caught. It’s ingredients that can go in ingredients to make products sold by your reputable local grocer or restaurant.

New research shows that the most common food fraud ingredients are olive oil, milk, honey, saffron, orange juice, coffee and apple juice.

I find myself shopping more often at places that display clear labels about food origins and buying products with ingredient lists and nutritional information that go beyond what’s mandated by law.  Hopefully they’re being honest.  But why should I have to think about that?  Who makes the decision to lie?  What’s the situation in your industry?

Thoughts?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under food, Reality checks

When Does An Offer Of Help Constitute A Bribe?

I’ve been wrestling with something over the last 24 hours and I’m hoping you all might have some thoughts on the matter.  As I’ve mentioned before, as someone who blogs on a regular basis, I get offers from various folks almost every day.  These offers are interview opportunities, review copies of books, maybe the odd report here or there, and I’m usually happy to hear about them.  It may not seem like it, but coming up with content for the screed can be a challenge!

Bribe Deutsch: Bestechung Suomi: Lahjus Русски...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Anyway, yesterday I received an offer from a publicist to interview an author and/or to get a copy of the author’s new book.  Nothing unusual there.  What followed in the email, however, is what’s giving me pause:

In exchange for your help, we’re also happy to help you in any way we can – from blogging about you, sending traffic your way or even getting you linked into our affiliate program to make you a few bucks.

As an author myself, I’m always looking to grow the readership of this blog (and I hope you tell folks to check it out when you can!), so an offer of traffic or publicity or some cash based on book sales are things which are appealing.  On the surface, this is something that’s just a “you help me out, here is how I can help you” exchange that goes on in business all the time.  So let me explain why I’m troubled.

There’s a statement on the PR firm‘s website which says they always act with honesty and integrity and never compromise the truth. They also stick to “white hat” marketing tactics, never trying anything that could comprise a client’s image or brand.  Very commendable, so why does the above offer feel smarmy?  In my mind, it feels like a bribe – write about our client and we’ll do what we can for you.  Maybe it’s because everything is conditioned on me publicizing their client instead of a “we love your blog, we’re going to publicize it and by the way, you might be interested in this other person with whom we’re working.”  Of course, one had to wonder what happens when 20 or 30 of these offers are accepted – how much linking and writing can they really do?  How many book sales would it take to generate meaningful cash, or even enough for a trip to the movies?

I turned them down, mostly because the author’s expertise doesn’t really match the focus of this blog.  I probably could have found an area of the author’s expertise to fit but there was the other issue of why I was speaking to her in the first place.  While this isn’t the first time I’ve received offers for stuff beyond the interview opportunity or review copy of a book, it is one of the most blatant.  So what do you think?  Am I being too critical or do you think this steps over the ethical line?

Enhanced by Zemanta

4 Comments

Filed under Reality checks, Thinking Aloud