Tag Archives: politics

Partners

There’s a story about Mickey MantleWhen he was asked what kind of salary he would get as a Yankee in the modern era, Mantle’s response was that he’d go to George Steinbrenner and say “Howdy, Partner.” Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Reality checks, Thinking Aloud, What's Going On

The One About Politics

As I’ve said before, this blog is not about politics.  However, with the opening of the Democratic Convention and the true beginning of the Presidential race, it seems an appropriate time to write about an aspect of politics that holds very true in business as well.

One big mistake about which I used to caution the people I managed was what I called the Sonny Corleone error.  As Tom Hagan says, “Your father wouldn’t want to hear this, Sonny. This is business not personal.”  What I meant by that was that personal attacks can’t ever take the place of sound logic and a good plan.  In debates, they call this argumentum ad hominem. The fancy Latin simply means argument against the person and is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather than the idea itself.

I am very hopeful that the two candidates will not commit this error.  I believe that most Americans want to hear what each of their respective plans are for our country and then make a decision about which plan to support.  You can do business with people who aren’t your cup of tea – you don’t like their clothes, their hair, their political party, their world view – as long as they don’t stray ethically in a manner that affects your dealings with them.  What I mean by that is that it’s unimportant to me if a business partner likes to drink or gamble as long as that drinking and gambling doesn’t cause him to rip off customers.  I’ve done plenty of business over the years with folks I probably would not invite to my home (and I’m sure they’re not itching to have me over either).  That doesn’t mean we didn’t have productive dealings.  Yes, I’m concerned if either of the two candidates is on the mob’s payroll but I don’t care if they got drunk 25 years ago.

As the campaign rolls to November, listen for who is emphasizing a plan and who is committing the error of argumentum ad hominem.  It’s not good in business and it’s no better in the business of politics.

Leave a comment

Filed under Reality checks, Thinking Aloud

Why it’s different this time

This is not a political post. That said, this piece on the Obama campaign’s use of digital media channels to disintermediate demonstrates how things have changed, even in the four years since our last exercise in freedom:

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has launched a Web site to dispel rumors about his faith and patriotism and his wife’s views on race that have dogged his candidacy for more than a year.

This is what any good business should be doing now, along with, of course, using some of the more traditional channels to dispel untruths. The classic example is the rumors surrounding a series of poisonings and how it affected the product. While the response to the Tylenol problem of the early 80’s required J&J to work through print and television, both paid and unpaid, to get their message out, they also took tangible action beyond PR as they recalled $100m worth of product. Today, while tangible action is always key, when there is nothing to be done except present facts, that action must be done through every means available.

Regardless of your political affiliation, the use in this campaign of everything from Twitter to SEO and how it has made a difference is great to watch. I’m excited to see which side does a better job. Our election cycle is a very public example of short-term brand-building and it is a zero-sum game, unlike non-political branding. It has a protracted window – sort of the ultimate brand-building reality show. I, for one, am paying attention to the lessons we can take away.

1 Comment

Filed under Consulting