Tag Archives: Marketing and Advertising

Anything Worth Doing…

There was an expression my friends and I used to use when we were much younger and not quite as smart.

Times Square signs at night

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

OK, we were dumb. The expression was that “anything worth doing is worth overdoing.” Boy were we wrong. Unfortunately, while we seemed to learn the fallacy of the phrase, many people and brands haven’t.

What’s brought this rant on are a few things. First is the ALS ice bucket challenge, which is absolutely something worth doing. It’s raising awareness of, and a lot of money to do research on the causes of and cure for, a horrible disease. That said, I can’t look at any piece of media – social or otherwise – without someone dumping a bucket of ice water over their head. At some point I wonder if meaning of the challenge gets lost.

Think about how many clever “instant” ads followed on the heels of the famous Oreo tweet during the Super Bowl power outage. By the time of the World Cup last month, when Luis Suarez bit an opponent on the pitch, many companies fired off clever ads (let’s be real – they’re ads!) almost immediately. In fact, Snickers earned a total of 15 million impressions within seconds. While Snickers and a few others stood out, many of the brand messages fell into the abyss.  Overdoing? It felt like it in the aggregate.

There is a daily newsletter I find valuable.  I get the mailing and then 20 minutes later I get it again – same mailbox, same mailing – even though I’d already read it and moved on.  It’s less valuable when it’s just clutter and overdone.

Where I come out is this:  marketing (which is worth doing) is not worth overdoing.  It needs to be focused, it needs to add value, and it needs to drive your business objectives in the context of the consumer’s needs.  People are overwhelmed with messages – don’t waste their time with content that’s irrelevant to them.

Was that overdone?

Leave a comment

Filed under Thinking Aloud

Cheerleaders

It’s getting to be the weekend again which means that many of you will be watching sports.

Cheerleader of the Aachen Steelers team at the...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Maybe it’s your local baseball team, maybe it’s one of your kids, or maybe it’s one of the many hours of televised sports that will be available.  The reason sports rights fees continue to rise so dramatically despite the continued fragmentation of audiences is because the market sees sports as one of the few pieces of content that really must be watched as it happens.  They’re sort of DVR-proof.

That’s part of the secret but the real truth is that sports make people care.  There is an emotional connection with the team or with a player.  If you ever played a sport I suspect there is a part of you that feels the excitement of competition again as well.  Fans are cheerleaders and maybe even more.  Some researchers have found that fans experience hormonal surges and other physiological changes while watching games.  The emotional connection is strong because, to a certain extent, whomever you root for represents you.  When they win, you do too.

That got me thinking.  How do we bring that deep connection outside of sports? How do we get them to see themselves not so much as buying products but rather belonging to a larger movement?  Apple certainly has done that.  Some mom and pop local businesses manage to do that as well.  The get their customers to root for them as they would a sports team.  Those teams are a central component to their daily lives.  How can we make our brands play that kind of role?

It certainly isn’t by selling.  When your team takes the field, they sweat and get hurt for you to win.  Are we making consumers feel that we’d do the same thing for them, or are we constantly asking them to do something for us?  How can we turn customers into cheerleaders? Something to think about.

Leave a comment

Filed under sports business, Thinking Aloud

Critics Vs. Trolls

Any of us who work in and around marketing understand that to a large extent consumers control our brands these days.

Troll in Trondheim

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Ask any company that’s run into difficulty with its image due to a social media faux pas or to some bad consumer experience that’s gone viral and they’ll tell you.  I think that brands lay the groundwork – they shape the experience but ultimately consumers are the ones who refine that groundwork into the image the world at large has of a brand.

Given that, and given the need for brands to participate in the social world, they’re going to encounter people who have had either a less than optimal interaction with the brand or who just don’t like whatever it is that the brand is selling/doing.  Those people might use the social tools to let the world know about it since as we know it’s the less happy people who tend to lead brand discussions and not usually the staunch brand advocates (until they’re prompted somehow).  I think it’s important that the recipients of the criticism differentiate between the two main types of people who offer it up:  critics and trolls.  They need to be dealt with differently.

Critics tend to express their displeasure in a thought-out, rational way.  They usually have facts at their disposal and will listen both to other facts and promises to rectify whatever it is that irked them in the first place.  Think of a restaurant review – maybe they just didn’t like the food – that’s opinion.  Or maybe the food arrived cold and slowly – those are facts and problems which can be fixed.  Critics help brands make themselves better.

Trolls, on the other hand, tend to be deliberately inflammatory.  They are not trying to help fix anything – they just want people to respond, start flame wars, and get their jollies this way.  They usually lack facts, they usually direct personal attacks as part of their rants, and harassment and stupidity are the cesspools in which they live.

What does one do?  As we said the other day, you must respond to them both.  Don’t do so by attacking them.  Get your facts straight, point out opinions (which you respect) from facts, and accept that the critics might help you get better.  Trolls go away when no one takes their bait.  Good critics acknowledge improvement and it’s fair to reach out to them once you’ve fixed whatever was wrong.  Our constant focus on the customer means we need to allow them to help us get better even as we continue to shape the brand we want them to see.

Make sense?

Leave a comment

Filed under Consulting, digital media, Uncategorized