Tag Archives: business thinking

Cooking Trolls.

Our Foodie Friday Fun this week deals with cooking trolls.

English: Troll Federlandese

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Of course I don’t mean actually cooking them but then again those evil creatures don’t actually exist either.  Restaurants – and every other business – have to deal with negative reviews in social and other media.  Sometimes they’re warranted and sometimes they drift over into troll-dom.  Today’s screed is about how one restaurant owner handled a troll and hopefully we can all learn a little something from his method.

As the folks at ABC reported:

After a customer posted a review on UrbanSpoon — which has since been deleted — requesting that the servers show more skin, owner Daniel McCawley took matters into his own hands.

“It was brutish. I was upset. I’m a father of a 12-year-old girl and I’ve got five sisters,” McCawley said. “The way that women are treated is pretty personal as far as I’m concerned.”

He did show more skin by offering a potato skin special. 100% of the proceeds will go directly to the West Virginia Foundation for Rape Information Services.  Clever, non-confrontational, and it generated a ton of positive buzz for his business.  That’s the right way to handle this sort of thing.  Suing the trolls (if you can find out their real identities), forcing review sites to delete the negative reviews, or responding in kind with defamatory comments about the poster do nothing but make you appear small.  My lawyer friends would tell you that it also opens you up to a series of legal issues when you start making allegations.

We forget sometime that if we serve 10,000 people and make 99.99% of them happy, there is still one unhappy customer.  In fact, some people who post these reviews had a great experience but, like the idiot above, find something about which to complain.  You can ignore it (which is probably what I would have done in this case) or use it to do something smart to cook the troll (which is where the owner proves he’s smarter than me!) or choose to jump down into the mud with them.  Your call.

Leave a comment

Filed under food, Helpful Hints

Switch It

The World Cup starts tomorrow. It’s the greatest sporting event on the planet, in my humble opinion. There is a phrase in soccer – switching it – that refers to moving the ball into a completely different area, usually across the field, to gain time and space. That’s what I want to write about today, prompted by an announcement made yesterday.  It raises a great business point.

According to the Japan Times:

Toyota Motor Corp. plans to begin commercial production of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in mid-December and roll out the next-generation green car by the end of this year, ahead of its earlier target of 2015, sources said Wednesday.

What is that and why is it important?  The car is powered by electricity generated through a chemical reaction of hydrogen and oxygen.  No fossil fuels anywhere.  Initially it is going to cost around $78,000 but the price will come down, hopefully to half of that in 5 years.  That price drop isn’t unusual.  After all, an Apple II was $1,300 in 1977 – that’s around $4,800 today.  When the IBM PC came out in 1981, people still wondered why they’d need a “personal” computer, especially one that cost the equivalent of almost $4,000 today.  Like a hydrogen car, the support system – fuel stations in the case of the car, software in the case f the computers – wasn’t developed.  As the world woke up to the better technology, that support system matured and here we are.

What’s my business point?  Many companies have tried to improve the gas mileage.  Very few – fully electric cars such as Tesla – have thought about changing the paradigm – switching the ball on the field.  Getting off fossil fuels changes everything from global politics to climate.  It’s a big idea.  That’s the kind of thinking that moves businesses forward.  Like soccer players running into a stiff defense, switching the ball – changing the underlying assumptions that drive the thinking – can buy time and space and maybe even result in finding an opening to the goal.

Worth a try?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Consulting

Your Freezer Is A Rat

Let’s go to the land of creepy this morning.  A couple of things have come out over the last month which transported me there and I thought I’d invite you along for the ride.

Refridgerator with character

(Photo credit: magnetbox)

The first is a study from the folks at IDC Retail Insights and the second comes from TRUSTe.  Both deal with a topic we’ve discussed here in the screed from time to time: data and privacy.

How would you feel about your freezer ratting you out to your doctor about your nightly three scoops of ice cream?  It’s a possibility, you know.  As the “Internet Of Things” becomes a reality, the same smart appliance that lets you know the ice cream is nearly empty and which adds it to your digital shopping list can also report in the frequency and rate of the product’s depletion.  To whom?  Your doctor, your insurance company, or to anyone else that buys the data.  That makes me uncomfortable (not that I eat ice cream any more) and apparently I’m not alone:

When researchers told the survey respondents that their Web-enabled devices could collect data, the vast majority — 87% — said they were concerned about the type of personal information gathered. Almost the same proportion — 85% — said they would want to know more about data collection before using “smart” devices… Just 14% were comfortable sharing such information with ad companies, while only 19% felt okay about allowing market researchers to access the data.

That’s from the Media Post report on the TRUSTe study.  I believe that many companies entering this space are of the “ask for forgiveness” mindset instead of the “get their permission.”  That’s unfortunate and might lead to some nasty backlash, as the IDC study found:

According to the survey results, and contrary to popular belief, only a minority of consumers are openly disposed to the “give to get” exchange of private information for guidance dependent on a retailer having access to such information – 14% are privacy spenders and 15% are open guidance seekers… Shoppers split about equally into two groups, those who choose privacy over relevancy and those who prefer relevancy over privacy, 53% to 47%. But by nearly a two-to-one margin, 62% to 38%, more consumers believe that they do not have enough control over their privacy in the hands of the retailers they shop.

So while the advantages of the technology, both for consumers and for businesses, are evolving, I’m of the opinion that a strong statement about privacy needs to come from the folks who are pulling together these collection devices.  We’ve seen the FTC cite Google, Facebook, and others for gathering data without permission and consumers are even more attuned to the practice now than they were years ago.  Why not get better data in the open instead of asking our appliances to rat us out without our permission?  Thoughts?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Thinking Aloud, What's Going On