Monthly Archives: February 2014

Chef? What Chef?

Our Foodie Friday Fun this week coincides with Valentine’s Day.

Chef preparing food 2

 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Many of us will be taking our valentines out for a special meal to celebrate.  It’s nice to have someone else do the cooking every so often and hopefully that food is of a higher quality and more sophisticated that what we’d prepare ourselves.  Then again, it might just be frozen vegetables and a microwaved entrée.  Think I’m kidding?

Anyone who has ever watched any of the “kitchen rescue” shows – Restaurant Impossible or Kitchen Nightmares – knows that some lower quality places substitute the microwave for the stove, presenting reheated frozen food as freshly made.  However, as a recent Wall Street Journal article pointed out, even high-end places in France serve food that has been cooked elsewhere.  In fact, of the 80,000 table-service restaurants in France, fewer than 10% have labels certifying that most of their ingredients are fresh and that the dishes are cooked on site.  The reasons they cite are high labor costs and high food costs.  Who needs a chef when you have a factory?

The reasons behind this aren’t the point today.  Instead, let’s think about the diner.  When most of us go out, there is an expectation that we’re paying for convenience, sure, but also for food that’s prepared on site.  As with any business, when the business knowingly delivers something that differs widely from what the customer is expecting, that business is teed up for problems.  Put aside the fact that you’re deceiving the customer.  If all the restaurants serve the same frozen food from the same factory, what is it that distinguishes their product from the competition?  Service and decor to be sure, but is that enough to keep a customer in the face of the guy across the street with the same food at a lower price?

The message for all businesses is pretty clear in my mind.   If we cut corners, do everything cheaply, and sacrifice quality for margin, what are the long-term prospects?  Someone else can always find a cheaper way (hello, U.S. electronics industry, car industry, etc.) to do what we’re doing.  Instead, we need to provide value, quality, and something uniquely our own.  We need to honor the expectations WE set in our customers’ minds.  Deception is a self-defeating business practice.

I’d be angry if I found the exact same meal for which I paid $25 in the frozen food case for $4, and question going back to that restaurant again.  Wouldn’t you?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under food, Huh?

Smart Can Be Stupid

I’ve written a number of times on the subject of hiring smart people.

The Thinking Man sculpture at Musée Rodin in Paris

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Raw intelligence and a natural curiosity about the world are two qualities I’ve found to be universal in the great executives I know and I always spent a lot of time when I was interviewing new hires trying to uncover those qualities in the candidates.  As I thought about the search for that brilliance the other day I realized that it’s just not enough.  No, I’m not retracting my statement.  I do think, however, I’m doing you folks a disservice by not providing context.  Let me do so now.

Suppose you knew a really smart ten year-old.  He is constantly asking questions about the world and more often than not can hold his own in a discussion with adults.  His logic is impeccable; his ability to express himself is superb.  Would you hire him?  Of course not (although you might tee him up for an internship in five or six years).  While he has two of the skills one can’t teach, he lacks many critical skills for success.  Emotional maturity is probably first on that list; the ability to contextualize (or not) is the other.

What do I mean by that?  When we get too caught up in a moment we need to have the ability to stop, take a step back, and see the forest as well as the trees.    That’s contextualizing. Math teachers would explain it as probing into the referents for the symbols involved – I like that.  Great businesspeople can also do the opposite – decontextualize – maybe even at the same time.  That’s the ability to abstract a situation and think about it symbolically without all the immediate pressures of what’s going on.  These abilities – as well as other critical thinking skills – take time and experience.  It’s why older executives such as me have value that our younger peers don’t: we’ve made the mistakes already and have learned.

Smart people can be stupid.  They need experience, a grounding in facts,  and the emotional maturity that comes with time to be successful in business.  We all know the brilliant jerk – the very smart executive who everyone respects and very few like.  They can crush a company. Our challenge is to find the qualities in addition to smart and curious that make for greatness.  You up to it?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Reality checks, Thinking Aloud

The Kid On The Bicycle

We didn’t get our newspaper this morning.  Not the end of the world, I know, but humans are creatures of habit and one of mine is skimming the paper while I have my breakfast.  We didn’t get it yesterday either.  These are not weather-related issues; other than the bitter cold, the weather is fine.  I reached out to the NY Times yesterday – they had another paper here by early afternoon.  Hopefully that repeats itself today.  I also let them know that these two incidents have become more common of late and I’m getting concerned.

Why am I telling you this?  No, it’s not my usual ranting about some slight.  There is a business lesson in here.  Strangely, I used to use this exact thing as an example many years ago when I would meet with advertisers to talk about media planning.  I’d talk then about the newspaper business and how many millions were spent hiring reporters and editors, salespeople and printers.  I’d talk about the money invested in paper and in presses and in ink.  I’d mention the thousands of people who print and publish and distribute a newspaper.  Which is then given to a kid on a bicycle to get to the home.  My point then was about the junior people were entrusted with taking marketing plans and advertising strategies and making them happen efficiently without a clear understanding of everything that had gone on previously.

The point today is a similar but broader one.  I’ve subscribed to home delivery of the Times, according to my account, since 1992.  My lifetime value to them is already into the tens of thousands of dollars.  The kid on the bicycle (ok, it’s a guy in a car that needs a muffler) has me wondering if I am better off just buying the paper and maybe not every day.  By comparison, the other papers I take have come every day without fail.  The last link in a huge business but the one that has a long-time customer questioning the product’s value.

We all need to think about who rides the bicycles in our businesses.  A beautiful office can seem less so if the receptionist is rude to guests.  The aforementioned junior person who executes plans by rote with no real understanding of “why” is that same weak spot.  As managers we need to ride along behind, checking off each delivery.  We need to make sure the delivery kid knows the route and we need to motivate them to do their job as well as we do ours – maybe even better (don’t throw the paper in the mud, kid).

Who rides the bicycles in your business?  Who is the last link between your brand and your customer?  When was the last time you paid attention to that link?  Any thoughts?

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 Comment

Filed under Consulting, Thinking Aloud