Monthly Archives: January 2014

Mistakes Were Made

It isn’t often that a traffic jam becomes national news but that’s what has happened with some nasty delays at the George Washington Bridge.

English: George Washington Bridge from New Jersey

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

As it turns out, those delays were caused by some folks in the New Jersey Governor‘s office. Who those people are is the subject of a few investigations. This has been a big political story and you know we do NOT do politics here on the screed. However, as is often the case, there is an excellent business point to be taken from something that happened in the political world.

The Governor – New Jersey’s CEO if you will – addressed the incident yesterday this way:  “mistakes were clearly made.”  That may be one of my least favorite expressions and he’s not alone in using it.  You’ve probably heard business people do so as well – you for sure have heard other politicians.  Let me explain why it’s terrible in business – you can draw your own conclusions for other uses.

The language is passive.  The object becomes the subject and the subject – the actor or person in this case – disappears.  In the active voice, mistakes were made would be “I made a mistake” or whomever actually did commit the error would be identified and held accountable.  We use the passive voice to avoid identifying the subject.  That’s my issue.

It’s hard to hold people accountable.  In one sense it’s difficult as a person to force another person to admit they screwed up.  It’s hard to punish them – it feels sort of like you’re treating them like children – especially if the screw-up leads to firing them.  It’s hard in another sense – making sure of who was responsible.  In my experience there’s almost always an outside agent – a co-worker who didn’t come through, a piece of erroneous information provided by a partner or vendor, a computer that failed – that bears some of the blame and caused the error.  The easy road is let them all off the hook – mistakes were made.  That’s the road to failure.

It’s very possible to hold people accountable and let them feel free to make mistakes.  If people aren’t failing every so often they’re probably not pushing the envelope.  Part of that freedom to fail is the responsibility to admit the mistakes so they can be evaluated and prevented going forward. I think responsible business people put their hands in the air, admit they screwed up, explain how it happened and will be prevented, and everyone moves on.  What’s not acceptable to me is when no one is to blame and nothing is learned.   You?

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

King Harvest

Bob Dylan and The Band touring in Chicago, 197...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

It’s TunesDay and I have The Band on my mind.

I’ve been a fan since “Big Pink” came out way back in 1968. I was surprised back then to find out that this quintessentially American band was, in fact, mostly Canadian (everyone but Levon Helm). While The Band originated playing behind Ronnie Hawkins, they made their reputation playing behind Bob Dylan as his “electric” band.  The list of great music they’ve written and played is lengthy and their portraits of American life (particularly Southern life) are phenomenal.  I was going to write about “Life Is A Carnival” today (an upbeat song with which to begin the year!) but another tune seems more appropriate to a business blog.

“King Harvest” is one of The Band’s finest and most interesting songs.  The video below was filmed as they recorded the song in 1970:

There is also an outstanding version of this recorded by Bruce Hornsby I urge you to seek out.  Why have I sought out the song today?   Putting aside the amazing music which is upbeat and funky, the story is one of business failure and desperation.  The narrator is a poor sharecropper whose crops have failed, barn burned down, and horse went mad.  You think YOU’VE got issues…

The way the farmer finds hope is by signing on with a union (history says this may have been one part of the Trade Union Unity League in the late 1920’s or early 1930’s).  He buys in to the union’s message:

I can’t remember things bein’ so bad.
Then there comes a man with a paper and a pen
Tellin’ us our hard times are about to end.
And then, if they don’t give us what we like
He said, “Men, that’s when you gotta go on strike.”

Which is the business point today.  No, not that we should all go on strike (and kind of self-defeating for those of us that are self-employed…).  If you listened to the sound of this song you’d think it was an upbeat happy tune.  It’s very dark.  If you listen to the words he’s saying you might think the farmer is happy.  If you listen to his meaning, he’s apologizing for abandoning who he is for a new pair of shoes and an external boss.

When we’re dealing with customers or employees, partners or co-workers we need to listen to the words and not just the music, and then we need to pay attention carefully to the words to get to the meaning.  Make sense?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Helpful Hints, Music

Swimming And Synchronizing

There were a number of interesting things to come out of last week’s CES. Curved TV’s, self-driving cars, and stun-guns built into your phone case are a few of the more notable ones and there’s been quite a bit of press on many others.

English: New company logo.

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Most of those interesting things, however, don’t offer up opportunities for new businesses. One thing does in my mind, however, and that is the data coming out of a study conducted jointly by the folks that run CES – the Consumer electronics Association – and the National Association of Television Program Executives.  They conducted a study of consumers last October about how those consumers were using second screens to engage with video content.  What they found is the sound of opportunity knocking:

Of the Second Screen users surveyed, 79 percent access a second device while watching TV programming. Nearly all Second Screen viewers access asynchronous program content, either right before watching a show, right after watching, or between episodes/seasons, which offers a strong opportunity for program brands to increase loyalty and keep viewers engaged and watching even when shows are not on the air.

Only 42 percent of Second Screen users have tried synchronizing their content experience to live TV. According to the survey, synchronized content available for TV programs does not generate strong positive perceptions – only 13 percent of respondents said it makes their program viewing experience “much more enjoyable.” The majority of users said synchronized content makes their viewing experience “somewhat more enjoyable,” considering it less of a necessity than a “nice to have” for certain types of programs. More than half of those who access synchronous Second Screen content do so during commercials, so there is an opportunity to provide synchronized content that can be easily and quickly accessed during commercial air time.

In other words, many of us (actually MOST of us) are using some sort of second screen device but in general we’re not using that screen to enhance our viewing experience and no one has yet cracked the code on engaging viewers across multiple screens and devices.  For example – why wouldn’t a cooking show push out the recipe being made at the moment along with definitions of terms with which viewers may be unfamiliar, places to buy hard to find ingredients (maybe at a discount – partnership opportunity!) and links to other recipes that go along with what’s being made?  I’m aware all of those things can be done through the web site, but this is more about content providers being proactive and not the viewer having to do all the work.

What I especially like about this study is that it reminds all business folks that the ubiquity of mobile devices and tablets has changed pretty much everything.  If something as familiar as watching TV has been disrupted, what’s the effect been in your business and, more importantly, how can you use that change to your advantage?  How well we sink or swim as business people depends on the answer.

We’re starting to see more of this sort of activity. There is live, in-show voting on a number of programs and a number of sports applications try to integrate themselves with what’s going on in-game.  But as the study shows synchronizing program content with second screen content  is really a large opportunity over the next few years.  Someone (or multiple businesses) is going to crack the code, write the app, and swim very well.  You?

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under digital media