Thinking Differently

Apple used the slogan in its advertising “think different” years ago.  Over time, I think we all can appreciate how that mantra, perhaps grammatically incorrect or perhaps not,  has come to be reality in the types of products produced by Apple.  I’ve always admired that much of what Apple produces isn’t original per se – there were mp3 players before the iPod, for example – but Apple manages to take a product sector as it evolves, marry it to better technology, and change everything.

What has me babbling like an Apple fanboy this morning?  A piece of research on TV‘s of course, and a thought about how some research points to the need to think out of the box.

Over the next few years, the main devices we use to access video in our homes – and I hate to call them TV’s any more – are going to become connected just like our other devices such as computers, tablets, and handheld units:

Driven by digital TVs, satellite STBs and OTT video game consoles, the connected device market will grow from 256.8M installed units in 2011 to 1.34B in 2016. According to NPD In-Stat, smart devices will have a global CAGR of 52.6% during the next 5 years led by 36.7M connected video gaming consoles.

There are the obvious implications for cable companies and other businesses that deliver the video as a program service aggregator, and there are lots of discussions about how the services are bundled and priced.  My thought today isn’t about that topic but about the nature of the programming.  Who is thinking differently about the nature of the content itself?  Nearly all TV (in the traditional sense of a video stream) is presented the same way as it was 50 years ago.  The advent of HD got producers thinking about how to use the better picture quality and different aspect ratio but much of that seemed to result in just more clutter.  Some cable operators have tried to layer interactivity on top of what the program producers do but I’m not aware of that really taking off.

So my question is this:  who is thinking differently?  Who is going to personify the Apple slogan and take the new possibilities of a more widely available technology, think about it differently, and transform our viewing experience?  It just might be Apple, although their first foray into the space – the AppleTV device – seemed more about advancing their economic agenda than it did to be about transforming everything.

I don’t have an answer, but I do see the opportunity.  A billion connected devices is quite a potential market if someone gets it right.  But unless that someone thinks differently about the nature of TV and the business models in place on distribution, the content may lag behind the opportunity.  What do you think?

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 Comment

Filed under digital media

One response to “Thinking Differently

  1. Keith:

    “Think different” always bothered me because it does seem to be grammatically incorrect, but I concede that it might not be. As an Englishman I tend to be a bit protective over the English language, particularly it’s use in America,

    I trust you remember me, Trevor from Regrettably I couldn’t get any traction on the site and so I gave it up.

    Evidently you are not with the NHL anymore and by all appearances flying solo. Good luck with that,

    I too am enamoured by Apple, in particular the iPhone and iPad. I have been developing Geo-Location solutions for all the popular Smartphones.

    regards, Trevor Seeney

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.