Spam Buddies

Spam 2

Image via Wikipedia

Everyone has different kinds of friends.  Work pals, sorority sisters, roommates, golf friends. Each plays a different role in our lives and some of the recent changes both in Facebook and Google+ reflect that – the notion of sharing different things with different audiences.

Lately I’ve found I have an entirely new class of friends:  spam buddies, and today’s topic is a cross between venting and asking you all how we might combat this.  I’m also of the opinion that it’s going to get worse based on the changes we’re seeing in Facebook, LinkedIn, and others.  But let’s see what you think.

Let’s start right here on this blog.  According to my stats, I get between 250 and 300 spam comments for every real comment.  Of late, these have become a lot more creative as they try to be “real” people – longer, more conversational comments with commercial links.  They’re pretty easy to spot, of course, but that’s a lot of clutter that obscures the good stuff for me.

Then there’s LinkedIn.  Almost every group I’ve joined has been overrun by spam buddies – real people who join groups and push some product or service – sometimes subtly, sometimes blatantly.  Those are pretty easy to ignore – turn off the group emails – but it’s painful to get value out of almost any group anymore when there are dozens of spam threads hiding the real ones.  What’s become harder to ignore, all of a sudden, are the linking invitations coming from India, Korea, and elsewhere.  People who claim to be “a friend” and who have zero or a handful of connections wanting to link into your profile, probably to do data mining and more spamming.  Less obvious, more insidious, and as fast as I can “report spam” I get a few more.

Obviously, the same thing has been an issue on Twitter almost from the start.  The fakes are easy to spot – they have no profile picture or one of someone attractive.  They follow hundreds or thousands of people and have a dozen followers themselves (mostly folks who auto-follow back).  They tweet like clockwork – every 20 minutes some new get rich quick method.  Painful.

My concern is this:  of late, much of what we publish on Facebook and Google+  can make us more visible to unintended audiences.  With more information showing up in our data streams (which I’m still trying to figure out), how long will it be before those streams, much like the main Twitter stream, are rendered useless and we need to parse everything into subgroups to get anything useful at all?  That may be the intention but it’s much less user-friendly.

I like socializing (more in person than digitally) with my different groups of friends.  Unfortunately, I have this other group of “buddies” I just can’t seem to force to leave the party.

How do you deal with this?  Do you think it’s s threat to social networks of all types?

Enhanced by Zemanta


Filed under digital media

2 responses to “Spam Buddies

  1. Pingback: Who’s The Wise Guy? « Consult Keith

  2. I have often thought that all these great new communication tools would eventually fall to the fate described in Garret Hardin’s Tragedy on the Commons, much like CB radios did in the late 70’s and my e-mail in box(s) did ten years ago.
    Is there a solution? Yes. In smaller groups, business settings, social approbation works. No, in larger groups because it only takes one guy to snorkle in the punch bowl to dampen the party mood and the snorkler won’t be deterred by our disapproval.

    The good news is that the only non-spam comment I’ve gotten on my blog is from my mother. I’m glad I’m small.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.