Tag Archives: managing

Clarity

In the process of an all-day planning session with some clients on Friday, we visited one of their web sites and found, in the main box, a promotion for an event that had taken place a week earlier.  All of us, including the president of the company, were a little surprised that it was still up, particularly since it was in a prominent place.  The person who has been overseeing the sites (they have a bunch) said that he had asked that it be changed a few days back but apparently his request had gone unfulfilled.

As we discussed the situation, it was pretty obvious that there were multiple failures.  The first one was by the person who is in charge of the site in failing to keep the site up to date and relevant.  That shows a huge disrespect for your audience and yourself, in my opinion.  Most content management systems have some sort of start and end date for every piece of content – it’s not all that difficult to be sure that time-sensitive materials change at an appropriate time.  More importantly, why would you make yourself and the company you represent look stupid, insensitive, out of touch – you can pick any of a hundred words.

The second failure was by the person overseeing all of the sites.  He neglected to set standards and see that they were met.  He also neglected to step in to correct the situation as best he could (more about that in a second) by explaining to the site manager that out of date materials turn off readers and might cause them to go elsewhere for more timely information.  He also didn’t go to her direct management for help (she reports locally, he is a divisional person).  Lastly, he didn’t turn to his management and alert them to a problem.

The third failure was by the top management.  They never empowered the fellow overseeing the sites properly.  The gave him responsibility without authority, which I believe is a recipe for failure.  They also didn’t make his mission 100% clear to him either – he thought his role was more advisory than supervisory (hey – what are you – a consultant?!?!).

It’s good this happened before we make a major upgrade in their sites and do quite a bit to grow their traffic.  The lines of authority (and responsibility – equally as important) are clear now.  Materials will change on time and people understand the standards.  And we all had good weekends!

Leave a comment

Filed under Consulting

Seeing things

I took the dog out for a walk this morning and saw what looked like pieces of cellophane all over the yard. I mean everywhere; sort of like cigarette wrappers but bigger. Here is a picture of a similar one:

Turns out these were the dew-coated webs of the grass spider. Obviously, they have been in our yard all along but it wasn’t until the weather conditions – temperature, humidity, no wind, etc. – were ideal that one could see how prevalent they are. You can’t see them most of the time and they’re not really sticky.

How often do we miss opportunities because our internal weather conditions aren’t aligned? How can we be more insightful no matter what that weather may be?

Leave a comment

Filed under Thinking Aloud

MicroBooHoo

It appears as if the Microsoft/Yahoo deal is off again. From my perspective, that’s too bad. No, I’m not a Yahoo shareholder looking to cash in. I’m just a guy who has had business dealings with both and feels that the combination of the two would have taken the best of each of their worlds and made a stronger partner for the rest of us.

One of them is really good at technology (not that the other isn’t) and has a track record of innovation. The other is the best partner from a client service perspective with which I’ve ever worked. Instead of this being about ego (most business deals have a good dose of that in there) and control, I wish that they’d thought about where they’re NOT the best of breed and realized that one’s square peg fits nicely into the other’s round hole.

Someone told me many years ago to hire for my weaknesses. It’s not easy to admit you have any, but we all do, as do most organizations. Hopefully, that’s why they hire folks like me – to bring in a set of skills that are missing or unavailable.

The blogsphere has written many gigabytes about the other aspects of the propsed merger, both from a financial and a tech perspective. To me, the real strength of the new MicroHoo organization would have been a cutting-edge tech company with world-class client service. That is what is needed to compete.

Leave a comment

Filed under What's Going On