Tag Archives: Customer experience

Caught In The Storm (Part 2)

Yesterday, we began our Foodie Friday Fun with my description of a bad customer experience and the lessons learned.  Today I’ll continue the tale with what happened after I ended up in an Irish Pub due to a blown reservation and a nasty storm.

Having been seated in a nearly empty pub, I waited for a server to appear.  The fellow who showed up had little energy and stood there wordlessly awaiting a drink order.  I asked about “espresso vodka” (don’t judge) and was told they didn’t serve espresso or cappuccino.  That was not a good sign.  I ordered a black and tan, something that’s a staple of any Irish place.  “No draft beer at all.  It’s a building problem.”   After ordering something very simple to drink, I waited.  And waited.  And waited.  I looked into the bar area – it was pretty empty.

Eventually my drink and server appeared.  I asked about specials – there was a “catch of the day” on the menu as well as a couple of other dishes that changed daily.  “We don’t have any – just what’s on the menu.”  I made my mind up then and there that I would have a little something to tide me over and head elsewhere for supper.  The artichoke and crab dip that showed up was badly made (chunks of unmelted cream cheese, very little crab or artichoke) and delivered to the table warm, not hot.  I can’t blame Mr. Personality for the food but it was his lack of attention and knowledge that changed my mind about staying, costing his employer a larger check and him a larger tip.

After the storm, I walked across the street  to the local iteration of Brio, where I met James.  I had barely taken my seat when he appeared (in a fairly full place) to offer me a drink, comment on the storm, and begin to tell me about the menu.  I asked for a wine list and it appeared in a few seconds, along with a few suggestions about what was well-priced and delicious.  The rest of the meal went the same way – highly competent service delivered with an engaging personality.  It was so good that I asked him who had trained him.  He told me he had gone to college for a degree in hospitality.  Boy did it show!  He also asked if I would tell his manager which, of course, I agreed to do.  It was the only time that James wasn’t squarely focused on me.

These were two diametrically opposed service experiences.  In one place the server had such a negative effect that I left and the business lost revenue.  In the other I ordered a dish I might not have otherwise, tipped extremely well, and left impressed by the professionalism of the entire operation.  It reinforced everything  I believe about proper training, good management, employees for whom the business was a career and not just a job (James was not waiting tables while looking for a “real” job) and customer care being a direct route to more revenue.  Was it the best Italian food I’ve ever had?  No.  The food was very good but it certainly was one of the best service experiences and it made the food better as well as the evening a lot more enjoyable.

The night ended with a dessert sent over by the manager with his compliments.  Believe me, the pleasure was all mine.  I’ll leave highly positive reviews around the web but I’m hoping you take away the business points I did.  Amazing how in the space of 2 hours one can see both ends of the service spectrum!

Leave a comment

Filed under food, Helpful Hints

Are We Getting Dumber?

Every day there are more articles written about the vast treasure trove of data marketers, publishers, and others gather from their interactions with customers.  Every mouse click, every social interaction, every store visit is another source of information that a business can use to make the

English: Somerfield, Spilsby One of the last c...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

customer experience more enjoyable and, hopefully, more profitable.  Nice ideal, but the reality is far from it, since most of the time the data is not collected, analyzed, and organized by capable people.  In fact, I’m willing to bet that the folks who could benefit most from all of this information know the least about it.

Here is something from eMarketer:

In a March 2015 study by Signal, 51% of marketers worldwide reported that they did not have a single view of customers/prospects across devices and touchpoints. In comparison, just 6% said their current solution provided an adequate single view of their customers. And Econsultancy polling in association with ResponseTap in March 2015 found that only 5% of client-side marketers worldwide had a seamless integration of customer touchpoints across channels that allowed for exploitation of opportunities. Just under a quarter had integrated channels but were channel-focused, not customer-focused.

That was about marketers’ understanding of mobile but there is much evidence that the same sort of low integration applies in other channels as well.  I mean think about your own experiences on-line and off.  I know my supermarket knows everything I buy because I’m diligent about using my card to get gas rewards – cents off gasoline purchases. That is a great value received – along with some good store discounts –  in return for me giving up my data.  That said, when I check in the scanner doesn’t acknowledge me by name nor are the coupons I sometimes receive at checkout very well targeted.  The mailings I get from the store – not the circulars – that’s asking a bit much – the coupon packs and email offers don’t seem very well targeted at all.  They have the data – they should be getting smarter and I should never want to go shop anywhere else – but nether of those things are true.

Every customer interaction counts.  We are getting a lot better about collecting them but we’ve got a long way to go to create a better experiences for our customers.  Media need to understand how to create that same better, efficient experience for their advertisers.  Heaping 15 minutes of ads into a 60 minute window isn’t it and the data can show us that.

So are we getting dumber?

Leave a comment

Filed under digital media

The Delusion Gap

Some mornings as I’m writing this I feel like I’m Chevy Chase reading the news that Generalissmo Francisco Franco is still dead because so much of what crosses my digital desk as news is just so “duh.”  When I read about the latest report out of the folks at IBM and Econsultancy called The Consumer Conversation Report I really did say “and Franco is still dead” out loud.  Here is why.

There is a huge gap between marketers’ intentions and their customers‘ satisfaction.  As the report says:

A common theme throughout this research is that brands’ belief in the strength of their customer experience doesn’t line up with their customers’ reality.

For example:

  • Only one in three consumers believe that their favorite companies understand them.
  • Of those consumers who switched consumer services in the last year, most did so for reasons companies should be able to predict and prevent.
  • Of the nearly 50% of consumers with a significant service issue in the last 12 months, only 28% say that the company dealt with it very effectively.

That’s a pretty important point.  We can’t pat ourselves on the back in business.  Our partners and customers are only ones who can do that for us and in this case they’re telling us something very different.  When 90% of the responding companies felt they were able to resolve customer conflicts in a satisfactory manner and not even 60% of customers felt the same way, there is a problem.  Let’s call it the delusion gap – the space in between our beliefs and those of our customers.  We all know that anger and frustration lie in the gap between expectations and experiences.  I’d suggest that the delusion gap is a direct corollary to that difference.

We need to use all of the data we gather to develop honest answers.  They might not be the ones we want to hear but they’re the beacons that point us to serving our constituencies better.  If two-thirds of those groups believe we don’t understand them and we believe otherwise, someone is delusional.  You?

Leave a comment

Filed under Reality checks