Standing In Line With Mr. Pepe

It’s Friday, and it’s a food-related weekend with both Passover and Easter happening. So for today’s weekly foodie post, I’m inspired by something that happened last night as we went out for pizza. Now for most of you, that’s not really a big deal. For me, however, pizza is something I have maybe once a year (a boy needs to keep his figure) so when I go, it’s to someplace special.  Frank Pepe Pizza qualifies as someplace special. Coal fired ovens, fresh clams and shrimp, top-shelf ingredients – a great pizza experience. Except for one part of that experience and that’s our business point today.
Pepe’s doesn’t take reservations. You queue up and are seated in the order of arrival. The line usually runs well out the door. This was the case last night when the Mrs. and I showed up. No big deal – it was past the main dinner rush and although it was cold standing outside, tables seemed to be turning – there was a steady stream of people walking out.  So here was what we saw next:

  • Four unoccupied tables remained un-bussed – all that was needed was a quick cleaning and more customers could go from cold and hungry to warm and fed (and generating income);
  • Despite “first-come, first-served,” larger parties were brought from the back of the line to be seated first.  Now, I understand that from the restaurant’s perspective, seating a table of 6 is better than seating a table of 2, but that’s not a perspective shared by those of us who had been waiting 35 minutes in the chill.

The reality is that if a manager had addressed the first point (available, uncleaned tables), the second point would not have been an issue.  There was a bit of grumbling by the parties of 2 that remained unseated while the relative newcomers were let in.  I think it boils down to having a customer-centric perspective, something we talk about a lot here.  While Pepe was doing what was right for the pizzeria, they weren’t doing the best they could for their customers.

The Stones wrote about “standing in line with Mr. Jimmy.”  The song is “You Can’t Always Get What You Want.”  The difference is you CAN always find someplace else to get it, and none of us in business should ever forget that.

Happy holiday weekend!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

If An Ad Falls In The Forest…

comScore published the results of a study they did with a number of major advertisers on the subject of ad delivery.  While the study came out last week, it feels as if there is a bit of a drumbeat starting to happen and I thought I’d join the band (hey – we’re always out front here at the screed).  There is an excellent summary of the study on Exchange Wire and if you care to read the entire thing you can download it by clicking through here.  In brief, to get a better handle on the issues associated with display ad delivery and validation as well as to test-drive  comScore’s method for this validation called vCE, twelve leading marketers participated in a U.S.-based charter study, called the vCE Charter Study.

Image representing comScore as depicted in Cru...

Image via CrunchBase

The biggest point to come from the study, which seems to be the headline on the growing number of blog posts that reference it, is that 31% of ads delivered were never seen by a consumer.  It also called out that 72 percent of the campaigns studied had some ads running beside “unsafe” content as determined by the advertiser and that a small percentage (4%) of ads targeted to the US ran outside the country.

For a medium that touts itself as highly measurable and targeted, these aren’t great results.  Then again, none of the articles I’ve found put these numbers into any sort of context.  How does this compare to print, for example? As we’ve said before, stats by themselves are pretty meaningless unless you have something with which to compare them.  There is also an interesting nugget that surfaces about ads running lower on pages, or “below the fold.”  There is a common misperception that ads delivered “above-the-fold” are seen, while ads delivered “below-the-fold” are not.  Surprisingly, the findings demonstrate that some ads delivered “above-the-fold” were not seen because users quickly scrolled past them before the ad had a chance to load, and many ads placed “below-the-fold” delivered a high opportunity to be seen.  This might mean that inventory “below-the-fold” can be priced as premium as long as the publisher can prove it was viewed.

To me this all screams out for some human intervention.  Digital ad buying has become a mechanized world as one ad platform talks to another and humans stay out of the mix for the most part.  Buyers need to examine sites for more than their audiences.  Sellers need to pay attention to the analytics that show more than traffic but also “heat maps” of usage.  Both sides need to do a better job of quality control.  One can question comScore’s motives a bit since they’re also selling a delivery validation tool that will allow for both sides of the digital media equation to get more accurate numbers.  Commendable, I guess, but I wish there was some way to redo the numbers based on more human involvement as well as to compare the results with TV and print “opportunities to view.”

What are your thoughts?

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 Comment

Filed under digital media, Helpful Hints

Make Someone Happy…But Who?

Fascinating look at the relationship between brands and customers this morning from the folks at Loyalty360 and Acxiom. And I quote:

As… empowered customers become increasingly savvy, marketers need to re-evaluate how they define and build customer loyalty. The issue, according to a recent survey of 129 marketing executives conducted by Loyalty 360—The Loyalty Marketer’s Association on behalf of Acxiom, is that although marketers know they need to focus better on customer retention, they aren’t doing it.

A business ideally is continually seeking feed...

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Think way back when – you know, like maybe 30 years ago.  Customers knew the companies with which they did business based on the faces they saw.  The butcher, the tailor, the book seller.  More importantly, those faces knew their customers and who bought what.  Today, those mom and pop businesses are, for the most part, history.  Instead, we’ve got chains and online megastores, and with that comes the ignorance mentioned in the study:

Only 49.6% of respondents agreed with the statement “I know who my most loyal customers are, and I know the best way to reach out to them and get them to engage with my brand.” Only 10.1% strongly agreed.

 That number would have been a lot higher years ago.  One only needs to walk into a neighborhood like Arthur Avenue in the Bronx – no chain stores, just gold chains around necks – to understand the difference.  Customers are greeted by name, they begin to fill orders before the customer can even say what they want since the familiarity is there.

Obviously it’s not going to go back to the way it was before the web and before chain stores.  The marketing dynamic has come full circle in many ways – from customer-centric control over local merchants to brand control over pushed messages and back to the customer.  As a piece on the study concluded :

Consumers have access to ever-growing volumes of information about products, prices, customer satisfaction, and availability. As a result, virtually all metrics, including loyalty, are in serious decline.

So go make a customer happy today – as soon as you figure out who that should be!
Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized