Category Archives: digital media

Dark Social

I will admit upfront that today’s screed is a little wonky.  You might want to stay with me though – you might just figure something out about your business as we go.  Ready?

The topic today is what’s been called “dark social” traffic.  No, these are not teenagers cruising Main Street late at night.  It refers to people coming to your website based on a link that’s been shared to them socially.  In other words, when I see an article I like and share it with a friend via email or messaging, most web analytic systems don’t really get how the recipient got to the website (although some are beginning to).  Since they clicked on a URL and went directly to the site (not from another website), it’s reported as direct traffic which is a big dumping bin of mostly unknown sources (even though it’s supposed to be users who came by typing the URL or via bookmark).  With me so far?

I did a little exercise on one of my client’s site traffic.  I looked at direct traffic which didn’t enter the site on the home page, an indicator to me of dark social traffic since people don’t generally type in long URL’s.  11% of their traffic was dark social.  With another client it was 34%.  I did some research and it turns out that those numbers are pretty typical – The Atlantic Monthly, which receives 5M monthly uniques, reports 60% of traffic from dark social.  Smithsonian Magazine realized it was 82% of their shares. Why is this important to you?

If you’re spending time analyzing your data to make better marketing decisions – which audiences to target through which channels, which content is socially relevant, etc – knowing what’s being shared and by whom is important.  The client I checked usually has a somewhat older skew and we use that in marketing.  The dark social traffic, however, demonstrates not only a higher rate of sharing of content among younger (18-24) people but also a higher conversion rate.  Very interesting and actionable data point.

The broader point is one you’ve heard before.  We need to spend time thinking about how our customers and potential customers come to and interact with our brand.  We need to formulate good questions and try to answer them with the data.  Data for data’s sake is useless.  Using data to drive actionable business decisions is where we are right now in marketing and business, at least where I and my clients are.  You?

Leave a comment

Filed under Consulting, digital media, Helpful Hints

Credit Where Credit Is Due

Anyone who has worked in marketing, advertising, or media is familiar with the concept of attribution.  It’s the notion that a certain message promoted an action – hopefully one that converted into a sale.

English: Dashboard 1

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I was always taught that the reason brands should use multiple media is that each medium had a role to play in that conversion process.  TV generated awareness, print was good for research and product information, radio was the great reminder medium.  Digital?  What was that?  Aside from the use of a coupon or an offer code or tracking via direct mail, the attribution chain was pretty much determined by special surveys and the thrusting of a licked finger into the air to see which way the CMO‘s wind was blowing.

It’s obviously very different today.  Many sales are made via online stores and are, therefore highly trackable.  Attribution, however, is still a bit of a mystery although less so.  Nevertheless, it’s a critical data point and as a recent Forrester study stated:

Organizations leverage many channels to reach and grow customers. The average marketer we surveyed is using 13 channels to drive his or her marketing and media objectives. This reflects marketers’ increasingly omnichannel approach to win, serve and retain their customer base. Sixty percent of these channels are included in marketers’ attribution measurements.

Obviously, missing almost half of your touchpoints in any kind of measurement isn’t great but it’s a start.  So what is this exactly and why is it important to your business? Think about your own purchasing activities.  You decide to buy a widget.  You might do a search which leads you to a website.  Organic search is touchpoint one.  You do your research and leave.  Maybe the site sets a cookie and remarkets to you (were you looking for information about widgets?) and you go back.  Remarketing is touchpoint two.  Maybe a week goes by and you see an article on widgets that brings you to the site again.  Content and a referral is touchpoint three.  Now you’re ready to buy and you search for “best widget prices”.  You click on an ad and end up there again.  Paid search is touchpoint four.  You buy.

The question is which source gets credit for the sale.  That’s the secret sauce of attribution.  The first click?  The last click?  How do you weight the journey to conversion?  Broaden it from just digital to in store and other media.  How are they to be accounted for (maybe the missing 40%)?  The majority of marketers surveyed (76%) have moved beyond single-touch attribution, but only 11% use advanced algorithmic attribution and as the study muses marketers may be hesitant to adopt advanced attribution approaches because they find them difficult to understand and communicate to their organizations.   I’d add there may be a hesitancy due to fear of contradicting the entrenched thinking about the need to support various channels and marketing activities.

This will continue to be a big issue – giving credit where credit is due.  How are you thinking abut this?  What are you doing about it?

Leave a comment

Filed under Consulting, digital media

Misplaced Problem Solving

A new week and another bit of news that has me shaking my head.  Today it comes from the folks at thePlatform which is a widely used video streaming service.  thePlatform announced that it has been working on a feature to defeat ad blockers and they have something that protects against ad blockers, making it easier to get ads onto new devices with minimal client work.

Diagram of Unicast Streaming

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I like thePlatform and have worked with them so please don’t misconstrue what follows as anything but me trying to a little wider perspective.  I’ve written before about the challenge of ad blockers for the ad-supported digital community.  To quote one article on the subject:

There are stats out there that say nearly 28% of users have some sort of ad blocker installed, a percentage that has spiraled by nearly 70% in a year. Ads that are blocked, combined with all the other ads that aren’t seen because of viewability issues, makes for pretty bad business.

Indeed.   In this case, thePlatform is looking out for the businesses that support their services.  I applaud them for that even though it’s a misplaced solution that doesn’t cure the underlying problem.  It’s fine to defeat some of the ad blockers for a short time and to help your clients with generating advertising revenue.  However, when you have 70% annual growth in something that runs counter to your business model, maybe the answer is to examine why people are using ad blockers in the first place.

Ad blocking is most popular with younger users – 41% of American internet users aged between 18 and 29 used ad blocking software, rising to 54% when only young men are counted.  Those are the prime years for developing habitual customers.  Yet rather than figuring out how to get product messages across without being annoying and intrusive the industry is figuring out how to thwart customers’ technology.  “We’ve been extremely diligent about making sure that ad blockers can’t find patterns in our URLs they can block on” says thePlatform’s CTO.  Hmmm…

I believe in the ad-supported business model.  I also believe that you can’t force-feed consumers.  Defeating ad blockers is a band-aid and a misplaced one at that.  We need to focus on how to make ads that don’t tax computer resources and crash web browsers.  We need to respect privacy, which is another reason people install blockers.  We need to stop producing band-aids and focus on real solutions.

That’s my opinion.  Yours?

Leave a comment

Filed under digital media, Reality checks, Thinking Aloud