One of the themes we touch upon here is the repeating nature of events.  Or as Peter Allen put it, everything old is new again (so much so that Barenaked Ladieswrote a song by the same name).

Image representing Facebook as depicted in Cru...

Image via CrunchBase

Today’s meditation on this concerns Facebook, or rather an interesting bit of research that came out from the AP and CNBC concerning Facebook’s future.  They conducted the poll in anticipation of Facebook going public and my immediate reaction was AOL‘s trajectory morphing to MySpace‘s morphing to…???   The AP piece summed it up with this question:

Is Facebook A Fad?

You’re laughing?  46% of the poll respondents believe Facebook  will fade away as new companies come along, and it’s not just the old farts – younger adults are no more apt than their older counterparts to expect Facebook’s long-term success; 51 percent think it will fade.

For those of us who have been in digital since the start of the commercial era, it’s not a weird question.  Fifteen years ago, one would have asked the same of AOL and could not have imagined that it would pretty much be a blip.  The rise and fall of MySpace is much more recent but illustrative.  So quit your laughing and think about how the nature of the beast is changing.  Facebook is going from a company built to attract and service folks like you and me to a company that’s built to attract and service marketers.  That’s not necessarily a bad thing except that Facebook seem to be bad at it.

You might have read that General Motors is pulling its advertising from Facebook.  That’s a $10 million deal — not massive in terms of value — but very embarrassing for the social network because apparently it was too hard for GM to quantify their ROI.  The poll data supports that thinking – 57% of users say they never click on ads or sponsored content, while 26 percent “hardly ever” click on them.

Like AOL long ago, there are some other underlying factors that might portend bad things.

  • Just 13 percent say they trust Facebook completely or a lot to keep their personal information private.
  • A large majority (59 percent) say they have little or no faith in the company to protect their privacy.
  • Even among the site’s most frequent users — those who use it multiple times a day —half say they would not feel safe making purchases through the site.

There’s another great analysis from Forrester here and I’m sure more will be written as Facebook’s IPO happens later this week.  So is Facebook a fad?  I’ll let you respond via the comments, but my thinking is that while “fad” might not be the right term, it’s definitely not invulnerable.  Given the underlying concerns from users and marketers, someone ought to spend an hour reviewing the history of AOL and recall that MySpace went from “the most popular site in the US” in 2006 to losing half its traffic between 2009 and 2010.  What’s your thinking?

Enhanced by Zemanta


Filed under digital media

2 responses to “Fadbook?

  1. I first saw FB when my daughter came home from U of SoCal on Christmas break 6 years ago. When I saw it, I said this is the new phone book albeit the white pages. The Bells made some from money with the white pages but the real money was always in the Yellow Pages, it just took them a few years to figure this part out. its been 6 years and Im still comfortable with my analogy. The phone book is dead. Facebook took its place. Can it deliver advertising..of course but itll take some time.

  2. I wouldn’t label Facebook at fad either, but you have — once again — hit the nail on the head. “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” But it seems nobody ever learns history’s lessons (ahem, JP Morgan) when money is involved. The prospect of getting rich off the next big thing is enough to convince everyone that this time things are different.

    But some things never change. In the digital age, companies that do not innovate are always a few years away from oblivion. I’m not putting Facebook in that category, but it’s certainly not immune. Yes, they have tried to innovate their user experience, but the privacy issues and the inability to deliver for marketers are huge warning signs.

    Nothing lasts forever. In the digital age, most things don’t last a decade. Facebook is no different. It will either continue to innovate to stay ahead of the curve, or fade into irrelevance as the next big thing comes along.

    There was a great case study presented yesterday by Gizmodo on how Yahoo destroyed Flickr: http://gizmodo.com/5910223/how-yahoo-killed-flickr-and-lost-the-internet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.